User talk:Ccw: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=Dual version vision= * Why do we need to support dual versions? I don't see any drawbacks of everyone just switching to 1.1 since it's more or less backwards compatible entirel...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Dual version vision= | =Dual version vision= | ||
* Why do we need to support dual versions? I don't see any drawbacks of everyone just switching to 1.1 since it's more or less backwards compatible entirely, and us enforcing that change by whatever means possible. The new features will make it attractive for server admins to upgrade, and we could try and work on the overall switchover process. This could involve releasing the server early, giving a client release date, and making sure all server admins are ready for the switch. | * Why do we need to support dual versions? I don't see any drawbacks of everyone just switching to 1.1 since it's more or less backwards compatible entirely, and us enforcing that change by whatever means possible. The new features will make it attractive for server admins to upgrade, and we could try and work on the overall switchover process. This could involve releasing the server early, giving a client release date, and making sure all server admins are ready for the switch. --[[User:Talidan|Talidan]] 16:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 27 November 2010
Dual version vision
- Why do we need to support dual versions? I don't see any drawbacks of everyone just switching to 1.1 since it's more or less backwards compatible entirely, and us enforcing that change by whatever means possible. The new features will make it attractive for server admins to upgrade, and we could try and work on the overall switchover process. This could involve releasing the server early, giving a client release date, and making sure all server admins are ready for the switch. --Talidan 16:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)